Papers with adversarial fine-tuning

4 papers
SafeQuant: LLM Safety Analysis via Quantized Gradient Inspection (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to jailbreak Large Language Models (LLMs) use computationally intensive verification or require adversarial fine-tuning, leaving models vulnerable to advanced attacks.
Approach: They propose a framework that leverages quantized gradient patterns to identify harmful prompts efficiently.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing defenses across multiple benchmarks while maintaining model utility.
Dynamic Evil Score-Guided Decoding: An Efficient Decoding Framework For Red-Team Model (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing red-teaming methods require expensive fine-tuning, especially for large LLMs.
Approach: They propose a red-teaming method that uses an ‘evil score’ to evaluate the potential of tokens to contribute to harmful outputs during decoding.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves an ASR of 92.83% on the Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct model, compared to 83.48% with adversarial fine-tuning while using less computational resources.
Trustworthy Medical Question Answering: An Evaluation-Centric Survey (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: achieving comprehensive trustworthiness in medical QA poses significant challenges due to complexity of healthcare data, critical nature of clinical scenarios, and multifaceted dimensions of trustworthy AI.
Approach: They examine six key dimensions of trustworthiness in medical QA . they compare how each dimension is evaluated in existing LLM-based systems .
Outcome: The findings show that large language models have improved patient safety and effectiveness . the models exhibit critical trust failures when deployed in clinical settings .
Vulnerability of LLMs’ Stated Belief? LLMs Belief Resistance Check Through Strategic Persuasive Conversation Interventions (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in question-answering tasks.
Approach: They analyze how different persuasive strategies influence stated belief stability . they also examine whether verbalized confidence prompting increases vulnerability .
Outcome: The proposed model exhibits extreme compliance, with 82.5% of belief changes occurring at the first persuasive turn.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations